Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Eureka
This post compares Palm Springs, California to Eureka, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | Eureka (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 27,024 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $33,280 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $249,300 |
| White | 83% | 75% |
| Black | 4% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 7% |
| With Kids | 12% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 37 |
| Rentals | 41% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Eureka?
A: Palm Springs has a larger population count than Eureka: 47140 compared with 27024 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Eureka?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Eureka?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Palm Springs versus 54% for Eureka.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z