Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Corcoran
This post compares Palm Springs, California to Corcoran, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | Corcoran (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 22,650 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $35,242 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $122,700 |
| White | 83% | 62% |
| Black | 4% | 11% |
| Asian | 4% | 0% |
| With Kids | 12% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 34 |
| Rentals | 41% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Corcoran?
A: Palm Springs has a larger population count than Corcoran: 47140 compared with 22650 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Corcoran?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Corcoran?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Corcoran does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Palm Springs versus 54% for Corcoran.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z