Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Concord
This post compares Palm Springs, California to Concord, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | Concord (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 128,160 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $56,608 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $461,700 |
| White | 83% | 67% |
| Black | 4% | 3% |
| Asian | 4% | 11% |
| With Kids | 12% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 38 |
| Rentals | 41% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Concord?
A: Palm Springs has a much smaller population count than Concord: 47140 compared with 128160 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Concord?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Concord?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Palm Springs versus 40% for Concord.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z