Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Burbank
This post compares Palm Springs, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $574,300 |
| White | 83% | 70% |
| Black | 4% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 11% |
| With Kids | 12% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 39 |
| Rentals | 41% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Burbank?
A: Palm Springs has a much smaller population count than Burbank: 47140 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Palm Springs versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z