Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Baldwin Park
This post compares Palm Springs, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $357,500 |
| White | 83% | 34% |
| Black | 4% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 18% |
| With Kids | 12% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 33 |
| Rentals | 41% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Baldwin Park?
A: Palm Springs has a smaller population count than Baldwin Park: 47140 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Baldwin Park does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Palm Springs versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z