Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Ashland
This post compares Palm Springs, California to Ashland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | Ashland (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 24,477 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $40,407 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $396,400 |
| White | 83% | 44% |
| Black | 4% | 17% |
| Asian | 4% | 20% |
| With Kids | 12% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 32 |
| Rentals | 41% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Ashland?
A: Palm Springs has a larger population count than Ashland: 47140 compared with 24477 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Palm Springs versus 68% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z