Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Alameda
This post compares Palm Springs, California to Alameda, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (city) | Alameda (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,140 | 78,246 |
| Income (median) | $45,934 | $71,080 |
| Home Value (median) | $340,600 | $729,100 |
| White | 83% | 48% |
| Black | 4% | 7% |
| Asian | 4% | 31% |
| With Kids | 12% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 54 | 41 |
| Rentals | 41% | 53% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Alameda?
A: Palm Springs has a smaller population count than Alameda: 47140 compared with 78246 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Alameda?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Alameda?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Alameda does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Palm Springs versus 53% for Alameda.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Palm-Desert, Seal-Beach, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z