Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Desert to South San Francisco
This post compares Palm Desert, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Desert (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 51,675 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $47,261 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $328,300 | $697,400 |
| White | 82% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 39% |
| With Kids | 17% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 52 | 39 |
| Rentals | 38% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Desert or South San Francisco?
A: Palm Desert has a similar population count than South San Francisco: 51675 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Desert or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Palm Desert.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Desert or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Palm Desert.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Palm Desert versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Desert may include: Palm-Springs, La-Quinta, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z