Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Desert to South Pasadena
This post compares Palm Desert, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Desert (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 51,675 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $47,261 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $328,300 | $928,500 |
| White | 82% | 54% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 4% | 29% |
| With Kids | 17% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 52 | 40 |
| Rentals | 38% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Desert or South Pasadena?
A: Palm Desert has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 51675 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Desert or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Palm Desert.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Desert or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Palm Desert.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Palm Desert versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Desert may include: Palm-Springs, La-Quinta, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z