Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Desert to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Palm Desert, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Desert (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 51,675 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $47,261 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $328,300 | $444,200 |
| White | 82% | 62% |
| Black | 1% | 9% |
| Asian | 4% | 13% |
| With Kids | 17% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 52 | 35 |
| Rentals | 38% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Desert or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Palm Desert has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 51675 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Desert or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Palm Desert.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Desert or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Palm Desert.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Desert does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Palm Desert versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Desert may include: Palm-Springs, La-Quinta, and Fair-Oaks.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z