Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pacifica to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Pacifica, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Pacifica (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
---|---|---|
Population | 39,141 | 20,423 |
Income (median) | $68,966 | $31,494 |
Home Value (median) | $740,700 | $322,800 |
White | 63% | 36% |
Black | 1% | 1% |
Asian | 19% | 10% |
With Kids | 30% | 54% |
Age (median) | 42 | 32 |
Rentals | 31% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pacifica or South San Jose Hills?
A: Pacifica has a larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 39141 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pacifica or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pacifica.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pacifica or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pacifica.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pacifica does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 31% for Pacifica versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pacifica may include: Laguna-Hills, San-Dimas, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z