Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pacifica to South San Francisco
This post compares Pacifica, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pacifica (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,141 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $68,966 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $740,700 | $697,400 |
| White | 63% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 19% | 39% |
| With Kids | 30% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 39 |
| Rentals | 31% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pacifica or South San Francisco?
A: Pacifica has a smaller population count than South San Francisco: 39141 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pacifica or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pacifica.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pacifica or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Pacifica.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 31% for Pacifica versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pacifica may include: Laguna-Hills, San-Dimas, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z