Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pacifica to South Pasadena
This post compares Pacifica, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pacifica (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,141 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $68,966 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $740,700 | $928,500 |
| White | 63% | 54% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 19% | 29% |
| With Kids | 30% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 40 |
| Rentals | 31% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pacifica or South Pasadena?
A: Pacifica has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 39141 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pacifica or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Pacifica.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pacifica or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Pacifica.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 31% for Pacifica versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pacifica may include: Laguna-Hills, San-Dimas, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z