Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pacifica to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Pacifica, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pacifica (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,141 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $68,966 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $740,700 | $374,600 |
| White | 63% | 81% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 19% | 3% |
| With Kids | 30% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 38 |
| Rentals | 31% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pacifica or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Pacifica has a larger population count than South Lake Tahoe: 39141 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pacifica or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pacifica.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pacifica or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pacifica.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 31% for Pacifica versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pacifica may include: Laguna-Hills, San-Dimas, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z