Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pacifica to San Francisco
This post compares Pacifica, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pacifica (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,141 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $68,966 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $740,700 | $927,400 |
| White | 63% | 47% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 19% | 34% |
| With Kids | 30% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 38 |
| Rentals | 31% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pacifica or San Francisco?
A: Pacifica has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 39141 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pacifica or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Pacifica.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pacifica or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Pacifica.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 31% for Pacifica versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pacifica may include: Laguna-Hills, San-Dimas, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z