Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pacifica to Palm Springs
This post compares Pacifica, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pacifica (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,141 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $68,966 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $740,700 | $340,600 |
| White | 63% | 83% |
| Black | 1% | 4% |
| Asian | 19% | 4% |
| With Kids | 30% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 54 |
| Rentals | 31% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pacifica or Palm Springs?
A: Pacifica has a similar population count than Palm Springs: 39141 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pacifica or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pacifica.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pacifica or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pacifica.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 31% for Pacifica versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pacifica may include: Laguna-Hills, San-Dimas, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z