Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pacifica to Napa
This post compares Pacifica, California to Napa, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pacifica (city) | Napa (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,141 | 79,722 |
| Income (median) | $68,966 | $51,449 |
| Home Value (median) | $740,700 | $536,800 |
| White | 63% | 76% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 19% | 3% |
| With Kids | 30% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 38 |
| Rentals | 31% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pacifica or Napa?
A: Pacifica has a much smaller population count than Napa: 39141 compared with 79722 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pacifica or in Napa?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pacifica.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pacifica or Napa?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pacifica.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Napa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 31% for Pacifica versus 43% for Napa.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pacifica may include: Laguna-Hills, San-Dimas, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z