Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pacifica to Foothill Farms
This post compares Pacifica, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pacifica (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,141 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $68,966 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $740,700 | $201,200 |
| White | 63% | 67% |
| Black | 1% | 9% |
| Asian | 19% | 5% |
| With Kids | 30% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 33 |
| Rentals | 31% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pacifica or Foothill Farms?
A: Pacifica has a similar population count than Foothill Farms: 39141 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pacifica or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pacifica.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pacifica or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pacifica.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 31% for Pacifica versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pacifica may include: Laguna-Hills, San-Dimas, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z