Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pacifica to Desert Hot Springs
This post compares Pacifica, California to Desert Hot Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pacifica (city) | Desert Hot Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,141 | 28,298 |
| Income (median) | $68,966 | $32,379 |
| Home Value (median) | $740,700 | $154,600 |
| White | 63% | 70% |
| Black | 1% | 7% |
| Asian | 19% | 2% |
| With Kids | 30% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 34 |
| Rentals | 31% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pacifica or Desert Hot Springs?
A: Pacifica has a larger population count than Desert Hot Springs: 39141 compared with 28298 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pacifica or in Desert Hot Springs?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pacifica.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pacifica or Desert Hot Springs?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pacifica.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Desert Hot Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 31% for Pacifica versus 56% for Desert Hot Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pacifica may include: Laguna-Hills, San-Dimas, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z