Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pacifica to Chino Hills
This post compares Pacifica, California to Chino Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Pacifica (city) | Chino Hills (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 39,141 | 78,025 |
Income (median) | $68,966 | $66,607 |
Home Value (median) | $740,700 | $567,200 |
White | 63% | 46% |
Black | 1% | 4% |
Asian | 19% | 33% |
With Kids | 30% | 41% |
Age (median) | 42 | 38 |
Rentals | 31% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pacifica or Chino Hills?
A: Pacifica has a smaller population count than Chino Hills: 39141 compared with 78025 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pacifica or in Chino Hills?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Pacifica.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pacifica or Chino Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pacifica.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pacifica does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 31% for Pacifica versus 23% for Chino Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pacifica may include: Laguna-Hills, San-Dimas, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z