Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pacifica to Beverly Hills
This post compares Pacifica, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pacifica (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,141 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $68,966 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $740,700 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 63% | 82% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 19% | 9% |
| With Kids | 30% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 43 |
| Rentals | 31% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pacifica or Beverly Hills?
A: Pacifica has a similar population count than Beverly Hills: 39141 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pacifica or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Pacifica.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pacifica or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pacifica.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 31% for Pacifica versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pacifica may include: Laguna-Hills, San-Dimas, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z