Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pacifica to Baldwin Park
This post compares Pacifica, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pacifica (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,141 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $68,966 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $740,700 | $357,500 |
| White | 63% | 34% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 19% | 18% |
| With Kids | 30% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 33 |
| Rentals | 31% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pacifica or Baldwin Park?
A: Pacifica has a smaller population count than Baldwin Park: 39141 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pacifica or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pacifica.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pacifica or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pacifica.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Baldwin Park does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 31% for Pacifica versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pacifica may include: Laguna-Hills, San-Dimas, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z