Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pacifica to Bakersfield
This post compares Pacifica, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pacifica (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,141 | 372,680 |
| Income (median) | $68,966 | $44,447 |
| Home Value (median) | $740,700 | $228,400 |
| White | 63% | 68% |
| Black | 1% | 7% |
| Asian | 19% | 7% |
| With Kids | 30% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 30 |
| Rentals | 31% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pacifica or Bakersfield?
A: Pacifica has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 39141 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pacifica or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pacifica.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pacifica or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pacifica.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 31% for Pacifica versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pacifica may include: Laguna-Hills, San-Dimas, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z