Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oxnard to South Pasadena
This post compares Oxnard, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oxnard (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 206,732 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $35,675 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $390,000 | $928,500 |
| White | 75% | 54% |
| Black | 2% | 3% |
| Asian | 7% | 29% |
| With Kids | 49% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 40 |
| Rentals | 46% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oxnard or South Pasadena?
A: Oxnard has a much larger population count than South Pasadena: 206732 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oxnard or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Oxnard.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oxnard or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Oxnard.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Oxnard versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oxnard may include: Santa-Maria, Escondido, and Porterville.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z