Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oxnard to San Francisco
This post compares Oxnard, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oxnard (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 206,732 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $35,675 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $390,000 | $927,400 |
| White | 75% | 47% |
| Black | 2% | 5% |
| Asian | 7% | 34% |
| With Kids | 49% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 38 |
| Rentals | 46% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oxnard or San Francisco?
A: Oxnard has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 206732 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oxnard or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Oxnard.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oxnard or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Oxnard.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Oxnard versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oxnard may include: Santa-Maria, Escondido, and Porterville.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z