Compare-Cities.com
Compare Orcutt to South San Francisco
This post compares Orcutt, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Orcutt (CDP) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,001 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $60,997 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $367,500 | $697,400 |
| White | 86% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 39% |
| With Kids | 32% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 39 |
| Rentals | 21% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Orcutt or South San Francisco?
A: Orcutt has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 30001 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Orcutt or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Orcutt.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Orcutt or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Orcutt.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Orcutt versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Orcutt may include: Lincoln, Orangevale, and Rancho-San-Diego.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z