Compare-Cities.com
Compare Orcutt to South Pasadena
This post compares Orcutt, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Orcutt (CDP) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,001 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $60,997 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $367,500 | $928,500 |
| White | 86% | 54% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 4% | 29% |
| With Kids | 32% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 40 |
| Rentals | 21% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Orcutt or South Pasadena?
A: Orcutt has a similar population count than South Pasadena: 30001 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Orcutt or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Orcutt.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Orcutt or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Orcutt.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Orcutt versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Orcutt may include: Lincoln, Orangevale, and Rancho-San-Diego.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z