Compare-Cities.com
Compare Orcutt to Foster City
This post compares Orcutt, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Orcutt (CDP) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,001 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $60,997 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $367,500 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 86% | 43% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 47% |
| With Kids | 32% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 40 |
| Rentals | 21% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Orcutt or Foster City?
A: Orcutt has a similar population count than Foster City: 30001 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Orcutt or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Orcutt.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Orcutt or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Orcutt.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Orcutt versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Orcutt may include: Lincoln, Orangevale, and Rancho-San-Diego.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z