Compare-Cities.com
Compare Orcutt to Foothill Farms
This post compares Orcutt, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Orcutt (CDP) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,001 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $60,997 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $367,500 | $201,200 |
| White | 86% | 67% |
| Black | 1% | 9% |
| Asian | 4% | 5% |
| With Kids | 32% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 33 |
| Rentals | 21% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Orcutt or Foothill Farms?
A: Orcutt has a similar population count than Foothill Farms: 30001 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Orcutt or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Orcutt.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Orcutt or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Orcutt.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Orcutt versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Orcutt may include: Lincoln, Orangevale, and Rancho-San-Diego.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z