Compare-Cities.com
Compare Orcutt to Baldwin Park
This post compares Orcutt, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Orcutt (CDP) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,001 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $60,997 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $367,500 | $357,500 |
| White | 86% | 34% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 18% |
| With Kids | 32% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 33 |
| Rentals | 21% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Orcutt or Baldwin Park?
A: Orcutt has a much smaller population count than Baldwin Park: 30001 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Orcutt or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Orcutt.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Orcutt or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Orcutt.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Baldwin Park does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Orcutt versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Orcutt may include: Lincoln, Orangevale, and Rancho-San-Diego.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z