Compare-Cities.com
Compare Orcutt to Bakersfield
This post compares Orcutt, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Orcutt (CDP) | Bakersfield (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 30,001 | 372,680 |
Income (median) | $60,997 | $44,447 |
Home Value (median) | $367,500 | $228,400 |
White | 86% | 68% |
Black | 1% | 7% |
Asian | 4% | 7% |
With Kids | 32% | 45% |
Age (median) | 42 | 30 |
Rentals | 21% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Orcutt or Bakersfield?
A: Orcutt has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 30001 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Orcutt or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Orcutt.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Orcutt or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Orcutt.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Orcutt versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Orcutt may include: Lincoln, Orangevale, and Rancho-San-Diego.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z