Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oceanside to Riverbank
This post compares Oceanside, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oceanside (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,811 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $44,912 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $423,100 | $247,200 |
| White | 73% | 79% |
| Black | 5% | 0% |
| Asian | 7% | 4% |
| With Kids | 30% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 32 |
| Rentals | 44% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oceanside or Riverbank?
A: Oceanside has a much larger population count than Riverbank: 174811 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oceanside or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Oceanside.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oceanside or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Oceanside.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Oceanside does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for Oceanside versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oceanside may include: Santa-Rosa, Upland, and Redlands.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z