Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to South San Francisco
This post compares Oakley, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakley (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,950 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $58,451 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $697,400 |
| White | 61% | 33% |
| Black | 8% | 2% |
| Asian | 7% | 39% |
| With Kids | 45% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 24% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or South San Francisco?
A: Oakley has a smaller population count than South San Francisco: 39950 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z