Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to South Pasadena
This post compares Oakley, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakley (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,950 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $58,451 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $928,500 |
| White | 61% | 54% |
| Black | 8% | 3% |
| Asian | 7% | 29% |
| With Kids | 45% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 40 |
| Rentals | 24% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or South Pasadena?
A: Oakley has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 39950 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z