Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to San Francisco
This post compares Oakley, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakley (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,950 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $58,451 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $927,400 |
| White | 61% | 47% |
| Black | 8% | 5% |
| Asian | 7% | 34% |
| With Kids | 45% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 38 |
| Rentals | 24% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or San Francisco?
A: Oakley has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 39950 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z