Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to San Fernando
This post compares Oakley, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakley (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,950 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $58,451 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $370,300 |
| White | 61% | 57% |
| Black | 8% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 1% |
| With Kids | 45% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 33 |
| Rentals | 24% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or San Fernando?
A: Oakley has a larger population count than San Fernando: 39950 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z