Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to San Bruno
This post compares Oakley, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakley (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,950 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $58,451 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $754,700 |
| White | 61% | 49% |
| Black | 8% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 28% |
| With Kids | 45% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 24% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or San Bruno?
A: Oakley has a similar population count than San Bruno: 39950 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z