Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to Redlands
This post compares Oakley, California to Redlands, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Oakley (city) | Redlands (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 39,950 | 70,765 |
Income (median) | $58,451 | $54,151 |
Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $350,900 |
White | 61% | 71% |
Black | 8% | 7% |
Asian | 7% | 7% |
With Kids | 45% | 33% |
Age (median) | 34 | 35 |
Rentals | 24% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or Redlands?
A: Oakley has a smaller population count than Redlands: 39950 compared with 70765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in Redlands?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or Redlands?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redlands does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 42% for Redlands.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z