Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to Pasadena
This post compares Oakley, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakley (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,950 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $58,451 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $689,700 |
| White | 61% | 53% |
| Black | 8% | 10% |
| Asian | 7% | 16% |
| With Kids | 45% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 37 |
| Rentals | 24% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or Pasadena?
A: Oakley has a much smaller population count than Pasadena: 39950 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z