Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to Palm Springs
This post compares Oakley, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakley (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,950 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $58,451 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $340,600 |
| White | 61% | 83% |
| Black | 8% | 4% |
| Asian | 7% | 4% |
| With Kids | 45% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 54 |
| Rentals | 24% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or Palm Springs?
A: Oakley has a similar population count than Palm Springs: 39950 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z