Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to North Highlands
This post compares Oakley, California to North Highlands, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakley (city) | North Highlands (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,950 | 47,357 |
| Income (median) | $58,451 | $35,489 |
| Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $168,300 |
| White | 61% | 65% |
| Black | 8% | 13% |
| Asian | 7% | 6% |
| With Kids | 45% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 31 |
| Rentals | 24% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or North Highlands?
A: Oakley has a similar population count than North Highlands: 39950 compared with 47357 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in North Highlands?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or North Highlands?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Highlands does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 57% for North Highlands.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z