Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to Los Angeles
This post compares Oakley, California to Los Angeles, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakley (city) | Los Angeles (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,950 | 3,949,776 |
| Income (median) | $58,451 | $40,932 |
| Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $549,800 |
| White | 61% | 52% |
| Black | 8% | 8% |
| Asian | 7% | 11% |
| With Kids | 45% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 35 |
| Rentals | 24% | 63% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or Los Angeles?
A: Oakley has a much smaller population count than Los Angeles: 39950 compared with 3949776 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in Los Angeles?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or Los Angeles?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Los Angeles does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 63% for Los Angeles.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z