Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to Long Beach
This post compares Oakley, California to Long Beach, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakley (city) | Long Beach (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,950 | 470,489 |
| Income (median) | $58,451 | $46,054 |
| Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $476,400 |
| White | 61% | 52% |
| Black | 8% | 12% |
| Asian | 7% | 13% |
| With Kids | 45% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 34 |
| Rentals | 24% | 60% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or Long Beach?
A: Oakley has a much smaller population count than Long Beach: 39950 compared with 470489 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in Long Beach?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or Long Beach?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Long Beach does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 60% for Long Beach.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z