Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to Lancaster
This post compares Oakley, California to Lancaster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakley (city) | Lancaster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,950 | 160,113 |
| Income (median) | $58,451 | $42,993 |
| Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $213,100 |
| White | 61% | 62% |
| Black | 8% | 21% |
| Asian | 7% | 4% |
| With Kids | 45% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 32 |
| Rentals | 24% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or Lancaster?
A: Oakley has a much smaller population count than Lancaster: 39950 compared with 160113 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in Lancaster?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or Lancaster?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 46% for Lancaster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z