Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to Laguna Hills
This post compares Oakley, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakley (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,950 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $58,451 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $649,700 |
| White | 61% | 69% |
| Black | 8% | 2% |
| Asian | 7% | 14% |
| With Kids | 45% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 41 |
| Rentals | 24% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or Laguna Hills?
A: Oakley has a larger population count than Laguna Hills: 39950 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Laguna Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z