Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to Fresno
This post compares Oakley, California to Fresno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakley (city) | Fresno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,950 | 519,037 |
| Income (median) | $58,451 | $39,069 |
| Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $206,800 |
| White | 61% | 56% |
| Black | 8% | 7% |
| Asian | 7% | 13% |
| With Kids | 45% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 30 |
| Rentals | 24% | 53% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or Fresno?
A: Oakley has a much smaller population count than Fresno: 39950 compared with 519037 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in Fresno?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or Fresno?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fresno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 53% for Fresno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z