Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to Foster City
This post compares Oakley, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakley (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,950 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $58,451 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 61% | 43% |
| Black | 8% | 2% |
| Asian | 7% | 47% |
| With Kids | 45% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 40 |
| Rentals | 24% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or Foster City?
A: Oakley has a similar population count than Foster City: 39950 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z