Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to Burbank
This post compares Oakley, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakley (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,950 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $58,451 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $574,300 |
| White | 61% | 70% |
| Black | 8% | 2% |
| Asian | 7% | 11% |
| With Kids | 45% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 24% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or Burbank?
A: Oakley has a much smaller population count than Burbank: 39950 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z