Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to Beverly Hills
This post compares Oakley, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Oakley (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,950 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $58,451 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 61% | 82% |
| Black | 8% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 9% |
| With Kids | 45% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 43 |
| Rentals | 24% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or Beverly Hills?
A: Oakley has a similar population count than Beverly Hills: 39950 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z