Compare-Cities.com
Compare Oakley to Belmont
This post compares Oakley, California to Belmont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Oakley (city) | Belmont (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 39,950 | 27,110 |
Income (median) | $58,451 | $107,466 |
Home Value (median) | $356,000 | $1,174,200 |
White | 61% | 62% |
Black | 8% | 1% |
Asian | 7% | 27% |
With Kids | 45% | 32% |
Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
Rentals | 24% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Oakley or Belmont?
A: Oakley has a larger population count than Belmont: 39950 compared with 27110 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Oakley or in Belmont?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Oakley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Oakley or Belmont?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Oakley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Belmont does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Oakley versus 40% for Belmont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Oakley may include: Beaumont, Murrieta, and Antelope.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z